Categorized Directory

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Search directory
  • Web crawlers
  • Collect data
  • Indexation
  • Bankroll

Categorized Directory

Header Banner

Categorized Directory

  • Home
  • Search directory
  • Web crawlers
  • Collect data
  • Indexation
  • Bankroll
Collect data
Home›Collect data›Reanalysis: the forgotten sister of reproducibility and replicability

Reanalysis: the forgotten sister of reproducibility and replicability

By Ed Robertson
March 10, 2022
0
0
  • Plesser, HE Reproducibility versus replicability: a brief history of confusing terminology. Front. Neuroinf. 1176 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the veil on reproducibility. Nature 533452–454 (2016).

    Article on Google Scholar Ads

  • Errington, TM, Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E. & Nosek, BA Challenges in assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology. eLife tene67995 (2021).

    Google Scholar article

  • Leong, HS et al. On the issue of transparency and reproducibility in nanomedicine. Nat. Nanotechnology. 14629–635 (2019).

    Article on Google Scholar Ads

  • Colavizza, G., Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Staden, I., Whitaker, K. & McGillivray, B. The benefit of citation in linking publications to research data. PLOS ONE 15e0230416 (2020).

    Google Scholar article

  • Kim, Y. & Stanton, JM Institutional and Individual Influences on Scientists’ Data Sharing Practices. J. Compute. Science. Educ. 347–56 (2012).

    Google Scholar article

  • Perrier, L., Blondal, E. & MacDonald, H. Academic researchers’ views, perspectives, and experiences on data sharing and reuse: a meta-synthesis. PLOS ONE 15e0229182 (2020).

    Google Scholar article

  • Faria, M. et al. Revisiting cell-particle association in vitro: a quantitative method to compare particle performance. J. Control. To free 307355–367 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • Johnston, ST, Faria, M. & Crampin, EJ Isolation of sources of heterogeneity in nanoengineered particle-cell interactions. JR Soc. Interface 1720200221 (2020).

    Google Scholar article

  • Faria, M. et al. Minimum information report in bio-nano experimental literature. Nat. Nanotechnology. 13777–785 (2018).

    Article on Google Scholar Ads

  • Related posts:

    1. Biden administration will not seek to join Open Skies treaty after 2020 release
    2. Emory creates a new institute for personalized medicine in brain health | Emory University
    3. New Barber Shop Instills Bulldog Name and Spirit: Olmsted Dates and Data
    4. CICSE asks schools to submit average grades for students in class 11, internal exam – The New Indian Express

    Categories

    • Bankroll
    • Collect data
    • Indexation
    • Search directory
    • Web crawlers

    Recent Posts

    • Live-Action TV Spider-Mans Who Didn’t Appear in No Way Home
    • Bennet bill would create federal definition of school shooting, direct incident data collection
    • The 10 Most In-Demand Entry-Level Remote Jobs Landing Right Now
    • Face-Scanner Clearview accepts the limits of the legal settlement | Economic news
    • Ex-minister embroiled in Hellenic row over staff cuts

    Archives

    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions