Reanalysis: the forgotten sister of reproducibility and replicability
Plesser, HE Reproducibility versus replicability: a brief history of confusing terminology. Front. Neuroinf. 1176 (2018).
Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the veil on reproducibility. Nature 533452–454 (2016).
Errington, TM, Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E. & Nosek, BA Challenges in assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology. eLife tene67995 (2021).
Leong, HS et al. On the issue of transparency and reproducibility in nanomedicine. Nat. Nanotechnology. 14629–635 (2019).
Colavizza, G., Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Staden, I., Whitaker, K. & McGillivray, B. The benefit of citation in linking publications to research data. PLOS ONE 15e0230416 (2020).
Kim, Y. & Stanton, JM Institutional and Individual Influences on Scientists’ Data Sharing Practices. J. Compute. Science. Educ. 347–56 (2012).
Perrier, L., Blondal, E. & MacDonald, H. Academic researchers’ views, perspectives, and experiences on data sharing and reuse: a meta-synthesis. PLOS ONE 15e0229182 (2020).
Faria, M. et al. Revisiting cell-particle association in vitro: a quantitative method to compare particle performance. J. Control. To free 307355–367 (2019).
Johnston, ST, Faria, M. & Crampin, EJ Isolation of sources of heterogeneity in nanoengineered particle-cell interactions. JR Soc. Interface 1720200221 (2020).
Faria, M. et al. Minimum information report in bio-nano experimental literature. Nat. Nanotechnology. 13777–785 (2018).